> [B]It isn't about how I "feel" about the word, but the implications the usage of the word makes.

The trouble is in distinguishing between the accepted meaning of a term (as set by a field of study, as reflected in dictionaries etc) and in the connotations (emotional feel, non-standard implications) that come to be associated with the word over time. I understand that FOR YOU the word has unpleasant / derogatory connotations. I also understand that TECHNICALLY the word has a very precise operationalized meaning and it doesn't have unpleasant / derogatory connotations at all - rather it is a relatively theory neutral DESCRIPTION of certain behaviors.

I do feel quite strongly about `political correctness' and more importantly in understanding the reasons behind terminology change (it does have a very significant impact on self-conception and the like). Don't forget `retarded' occurs quite frequently as a technical term: e.g., `psychomotor retardation' is a symptom of depression etc. The word is starting to take on negative connotations - but the trouble is that ANY word that starts out as a relatively neutral description comes to be adopted by some to signify an insult.

What can one do? Manage the intent behind our own words, I guess. We can't stop others using them with whatever connotations... We can manage ourselves.

> Wishing they had chosen a better word is not pathological.

I don't think that anybody is saying that it is pathological. But...

1) What would a 'better' word be?

2) How long do you think it will take before that word comes to be used (by some) with unpleasant connotations?