((((((((((((( Tomi ))))))))))))

this was just an article that she wrote for a local newspaper and she had to keep it under so many words. It's in no way complete. I could add a bit to it, too, but I think it needs to be taken on face value at first. All it is, is "milk." The "meat" comes after you've internalized the "milk."

Sorry, but my opinion is there is no "just an article". It's irresponsible to publish "diet" psychology to the mass public.
My concern is that many do take it at face value. How many apporach it critically or swallow it whole because of the credentials attached to the name? It certainly sounds good on the surface, but that's what is dangerous about these type articles.

Forgive me, but I still feel that you need to focus on just you and the changes you want to make in yourself rather than worry about "society" and how you can impact it. It won't be a positive impact until you know better who you are and achieve some of those changes that you want to make.

Of course I forgive you, I just don't agree with you. My dragon is about society. How do you suppose I work on my dragon without including it? We all impact society in some way, wanting to or not. I'm choosing to make my role productive the best way I know how.

I don't have time for more reply than this.....


"Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but rising every time we fall." Confucius