View Single Post
 
Old Feb 15, 2010, 09:49 PM
sunflower55's Avatar
sunflower55 sunflower55 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 458
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathyM View Post
My husband likes to watch the History Channel. I'm particularly sensitive to archaeological digging. It makes me nauseous to see them uncover human bones and man-handle them as if they mean nothing at all. I'd be FURIOUS if they ever did that to any of my relatives - or ME.

It's hard to believe the "truth" they appear to uncover about the person/object community life at the time. It's usually sensationalized, and it's only based on observation by those foreign to the area who have only studied books about the region.

For example....

What would they say about Haiti if the information of the earthquake was lost? Will they say the Haitians buried their people in mass graves along with their garbage - or say it was a massive human sacrifice to appease their "Gods" How will they explain all the foreign influence (missionaries and medical teams) they uncover - will they call it humanitarian aide or will they call it an invasion/conflict?

If it's okay to dig into the earth to uncover bones and history in other countries, why is it not okay to do it here? Would anyone here in the U.S. be upset if a foreign team of archeologists started digging up the graves at Arlington National cemetery years from now? I would. What would they be able to glean from their observations, and what will be said?
Kathy,
Arlington National Cemetery is *one* sentence in the entire 4 paragraphs that I responded to in your post. I do believe that PerpetuallySad responded to that issue quite well. I have no need to repeat her post.
Nor do I have any need to argue...

But, again, the point of this thread is historic revision, and the loss of history classes at a certain university....Maybe you'd like to start a new thread?

Peace!
__________________

IMAGINE