View Single Post
 
Old May 05, 2010, 04:35 AM
pachyderm's Avatar
pachyderm pachyderm is offline
Legendary
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Washington DC metro area
Posts: 15,865
Quote:
Originally Posted by lila11 View Post
Pachyderm, You are absolutely right that psychology and "brain science" should be complimentary.
There is an article in the April 2010 issue of Scientific American magazine titled "Faulty Circuits" that is the type of thing that really triggers me. Although at one point the author mentions that a person's experience may have something to do with the development of "faulty circuits" virtually all the article is devoted to examining the circuits, and he presents brain study as a replacement for psychology. One more way, as I see it, of presenting what may be a way to avoid examining how a person's experiences can lead to mental illness and dressing it up as "science". I see that so much in present-day mental health treatment. I have given up thinking of further therapy because I do not see anyone who is willing to look at my pain, preferring instead, apparently, to avoid theirs.

I actually submitted a Letter to the Editor on this article, but I don't know if that will have any effect at all. After all, brain science is so much more "scientific" than psychology!
__________________
Now if thou would'st
When all have given him o'er
From death to life
Thou might'st him yet recover
-- Michael Drayton 1562 - 1631

Last edited by pachyderm; May 05, 2010 at 04:50 AM.