Ok, really sad. Replying to my own post because no one else has. My post asks, "Why am I being ignored?"

PC represents itself as a credible source for psychiatric/psychological news but then does not cite in its own articles all the time. How are we supposed to take it seriously when we can not track back to its sources. I wouldn't have been allowed to write like this in my college papers, I expect better. While not all people reading PC will find this useful, there are those that will. I think this deserves attention. There is no way I can take the article I mentioned in the post above to my professor because he would laugh at me saying it is credible without having sources. And yet the topic is very applicable to our lab.