Quote:
Originally Posted by seventyeight
from a book called 'in sesson' by deborah lott. [.......] 'If the arbiter of mental health loves me,' he or she may think, 'I must be ok; if the one who knows me better than anyone else loves me, I must be supremely lovable.'"
|
this seems odd to me.
If the "arbiter of mental health", one who knows her better than anyone else, loves her, isn't the logical conclusion that she is
at least barely lovable, not that she is
supremely lovable?!