I would think that one respects boundaries expressed, whichever the intent is to breach it. By disrespecting it, people forfeith the right to be treated respectfully in return. A breach of boundaries is a breach of boundaries is a breach of boundaries. Or as they say, "No" means "No".
Everything else seems like excuses to me to disrespect them or to blame people for putting up boundaries.
Quote:
|
Furthermore, if the original source material, written false claims that openly attacked a disorder with which the defendant was inflicted, not only provoked the defendant but defamed his character and caused distress in his daily life, is that not an unethical breach of boundaries? Does the defendant not have a right to defend himself against such accusations?
|
So, you disagree with source material on your disorder? I do understand how source material on psychopathy in general may be upsetting. And it must be difficult to reason the source material is not about you. After all, the disorder would involve narcistic traits within you and therefore an innate difficulty to regard it as not being 'just' about you. Is not the source material the reason why you have been diagnozed with the disorder in the first place? And unfortunately the diagnosis cannot have been made without a history research and research of questionnaires filled in by people in your environment.
It was nice to have this polite exchange. Thank you for the invitation to this thread. Since, you are not a person in my life, I commend you for your self-proclaimed efforts to live with the disorder without causing more harm. I wish you much succes to putting it in practice, both for yourself as for the people in your life and those who come into contact with you or whom you contact. Without it being personal, I prefer to go no contact with you after this post to go back in dealing with my PSTD caused by a relationship with a person who highly probably is a psychopath.
Goodbye.