View Single Post
 
Old Jan 02, 2012, 12:20 AM
ECHOES's Avatar
ECHOES ECHOES is offline
Legendary
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: West of Tampa Bay, East of the Gulf of Mexico
Posts: 14,354
Quote:
Originally Posted by skysblue View Post
I think he's making the distinction because of how they are processed in the brain and a brain scientist has to be excruciatingly precise, right.

I'll quote another passage but for us I guess it really doesn't matter which word we use. I probably shouldn't have included his discussion of the difference between emotions and feelings because it's going to muddy the waters of our discussing the necessity of emotions/feelings for survival.

"The other important problem is the distinction between emotion and feeling. Emotion and feeling, albeit part of a tightly bound cycle, are distinguishable processes. It makes no difference what words we choose to refer to these distinct processes, provided we acknowledge that the essence of emotion and the essence of feeling are different.

"Of course there's nothing wrong with the words emotion and feeling to begin with but let us define those key terms in light of current neurobiology.

"Emotions are complex, largely automated programs of actions concocted by evolution. The actions are complemented by a cognitive program that includes certain ideas and modes of cognition, but the world of emotions is largely one of actions carried out in our bodies, from the facial expressions and postures to changes in viscera and internal milieu.

"Feelings of emotion, on the other hand, are composite perceptions of what happens in our body and mind when we are emoting. As far as the body is concerned, feelings are images of actions rather than actions themselves; the world of feelings is one of perceptions executed in brain maps.

"But there is a qualification to be made here: the perceptions we call feelings of emotion contain a special ingredient that corresponds to the primordial feelings discussed earlier. Those feelings are based on the unique relationship between body and brain that privileges interoception.

"There are other aspects of the body being represented in emotional feelings, of course, but interoception dominates the process and is responsible for what we designate as the felt aspect of these perceptions.

"The general distinction between emotions and feeling, then, is reasonably clear. While emotions are actions accompanied by ideas and certain modes of thinking, emotional feelings are mostly perceptions of what our bodies do during the emoting, along with perceptions of our state of mind during that same period of time. In simple organisms capable of behavior but without a mind process, emotions can be alive and well, but states of emotional feeling may not necessarily follow."

Damasio explains interoception as the 'sensing of the organism's interior"

If anyone understands his explanation of the difference between emotion and feeling, I would love to be instructed. It goes over my head.

But, the most important thing from his writings I believe is the scientific explanation of why we have emotions/feelings. It is all about survival.
So I'm getting from this that emotion is the automatic response: If you slap my face I will become angry. I also have the capacity to have the thought than I know that I'm feeling angry. But I might instead only register the thought that I want to beat you up.

So then feelings distinguish us from animals in a similar way; because, since I have the capacity to think about being angry and perceive my anger as my heart pounds and my breathing changes. Rather than just react, I have the capacity to choose my response, to redirect my response from beating you up to other behaviors.

I think. I thought I was clear when I started typing, anyway.