Quote:
Originally Posted by PreacherHeckler
I don't think saying "this person" necessarily implies gender neutrality that the therapist should have picked up on. It can also be used as a way to avoid saying "my father" or "my uncle" or "my male teacher" etc. The therapist may very well have noticed the use of non-identifying information but perhaps chose not to address it immediately since this was the first time Precious Things offered details and she was having a very difficult time talking about it. I think it's unfair to assume that he should have noticed but didn't, or that he should have used the same non-identifying words Precious Things used, because without asking him why, we have no way to know what he was thinking or what his reason may have been for assigning a gender.
|
I thought part of a T's job was to go down the path with the client. Even if it weren't about gender and were instead about the relationship of the person to Precious Things, it would still be important for T to realize that and mirror it until he found an appropriate time to broach the why of the word choice.
I am not suggesting that Precious Things' T should be lambasted for this, but I wanted her to know that I thought her feelings about a T noticing those things was valid.