Don't know if anyone else noticed but I went to her website and read 'about' that she is an artist as well and promotes her work. Part of that is getting attention for your work/your ideas (I have a degree in Fine Art so 'i get it').

I think she's a master at marketing. She's the 'Madonna' of the 80's and the 'lady gaga' of today in the therapy world and she's crossing that with her art. Look how many people are posting on this thread for example? Doc John how much did she pay you? IMO I feel like she's laughing in the professions face while raking in the dough.

AND

She isn't a licensed therapist so in case anyone wanted to know of course she doesn't take insurance :-) I find her website to be soft porn Esq.
The photos are professionally shot and there seems to be more emphasis on eye candy than substance. If there is real knowledge it doesn't sell or present itself that way.

I'm sure the idea is exciting to some people who would love to see her naked. I personally don't see the thrill.

I have enough transference issues as it is and everyone keeps there clothes on

PS - as a side note I've seen lots of naked people as I have drawn them naked. I believe the human body is beautiful and can look at it that way without it being sexual. Her objective is to sell it as sexual. Isn't there enough of that everywhere already?