</font><blockquote><div id="quote"><font class="small">Quote:</font>
You are detailed-oriented, huh?

</div></font></blockquote><font class="post">
You got that right. The devil is in the details, as they say.

</font><blockquote><div id="quote"><font class="small">Quote:</font>
I guess, I mean the quasi-monopoly. Big businesses like AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and Time Warner trying to push legislation meets their business needs that restricts access to the web for the public.

</div></font></blockquote><font class="post">

I'm really confused about this. Are we talking about the companies that own the infrastructure serving as gatekeepers to ISP's, or ISP's acting as gatekeepers to customers? I'd have a big problem with the former, and no problem at all with the latter. (If people want to go with a content-restricted ISP they should have the right; non-restricted ISP's would still dominate the market, though.)