And, from the link above, a reasonable modern critique of the theory for you:

• Evaluation of Freud's psychosexual development theory
  
  
  Four points:
• difficult to test, but the evidence that has been gathered is not favourable
• the crucial events (e.g., how the libido is used) are unobservable, and there are no good means to measure them
• there is an awfully long time between the occurence of the causal stimulus and its presumed effect; relationships between early events and later traits tend to be weak and inconsistent
• this theory of development was conceived without studying children; rather, it was developed from patients' recollections, dreams and free associations

Plus, since you MIGHT identify as homosexual and Freud does not have a good non-pathologizing explanation for that kind of attraction, YOU PERSONALLY should not look to his ideas as a source of truth regardless of the stuff about the non-testability of his ideas.

I hope it helps and hope that you will get good ideas in responses from people who report their own genuine experiences rather than engage in wild speculations.