Since I'm the one referred to as the "other poster" who objected to the animation link, its only fair I get to voice my opinion. All I did was say my opinion and it went on from there. I have nothing against the OPer of that thread (sexuality forum) at all. The thread was there to inquire about posters favorite position. Anyone can search the multitude of positions, so its not necessary to give the link IMO. One poster said he couldn't even access the link because his university has websites like that blocked - good call.

Swear words are censored here, so it made sense to me this animated link would also qualify. Fact is ...there's no way to block kids from here. Inquiring other peoples positions seemed invasive and it made me feel uncomfortable. In addition many of the positions go beyond the average persons physical abilities lol which may make some feel inferior. I have a sincere question and this isn't directed to the OPer of that thread........how does a website decipher between a legitimate sexual issue and a poster who tends to be perverted......then posts topics for his/her own pleasure? As I stated on the thread, I have no problem speaking openly if a person has a problem