PS

And, the way GG named his thread - "wife's history" - seems to have been intentional as it conceals the nature of the issue.

Imagine the thread named "History of the mother of my wonderful two children whom I love and cherish".

I am sure people would have reacted even more strongly than they did, trying to show GG the wrongness of his ways.

In other words, the way GG titled the thread, omitting what he omitted, constituted an intentional misrepresentation aimed at eliciting support for him from readers that he did not deserve.

Does not he accuse her of... an intentional misrepresentation aimed at eliciting his affection back then?..

Interesting, huh?