Oh, and also, besides the general preference for the phallic form (not that much size anymore, but form, although speaking of size, I went to Trader Joe's and grabbed a clamshell with blueberries not looking at details; I then looked at the details at home and found out that I grabbed Trader Joe's BIGGER Blueberries really BIG & Delicious net wt 6 oz (70g)), so, curious, I ate them without further ado and my pronouncement was that yes, they were delicious, but not any more or less delicious than regular blueberries from Trader Joe's, so I hope that men who read this while having an average endowment will rejoice - there is absolutely no functional difference),

OK so besides the general preference for the phallic form, I also have a general preference for data analysis, and, led by that general preference coupled with natural curiosity, I logged onto OKCupid, which I had not visited for months until earlier this evening.

So the inbox contains 192 messages (I am not responding now because I am unsure about online dating at present and because of intervening priorities, so I just let the messages accumulate).

The profile states that I have three children.

OK, so to the extent that men prefer tighter vaginas, except that I was not in the know about that wide-spread preference (and besides the four male partners whom I have had, there were interested but rejected (rejected solely due to my then state of being in a monogamous marriage and not due to their bad qualities of any sort) male candidates, all of whom knew about the number of my children), so to the extent that such preference exists in the general population, I have been able to form three hypotheses:

1) 192 people are interested in a purely platonic relationship with me.

2) 192 people believe that all my three children were delivered via C-section, leaving my vagina in a completely virginal state.

3) 192 people believe that soon after they get to know me, they will inform me of their preferences and request oral sex and I would be happy to oblige.

So all three hypotheses seem sort of a bit weird to me. Which one is... less weird?..

My only way out of the weirdness is to suppose that:

a) 64 men want a strictly platonic relationship with me.
b) 64 men believe that all my children were cesarean births.
c) 64 people have plans to request oral sex in the immediate future.

OK, so that is a bit more rounded, as hypotheses go...right?