No, you are wrong - I cannot admit that you are right on the strength of my experience (actuals-based) that, ahem, outweighs this little incident (assumption-based). I have been taught to prefer facts over assumptions, so that means that you are wrong as far as the general population goes, but you do seem to be right in the way in which you express your idiosyncratic preferences, to which you are undoubtedly entitled and which do appear near and dear to you, and since there is zero likelihood that I would be ever called upon to satisfy those preferences (see above about zero interest in people who subscribe to mechanistic views on sex, and, ADDED, little interest in people who project their idiosyncrasies onto the whole wide world), I think that we can safely state that there is no deep internal conflict created by our different takes on the subject matter, with which I remain...