Quote:
Originally Posted by hankster
I guess I dont even like the assumption that it was unimportant to the t. That sounds harsh - like demeaning to me. Like im not important. But I like how you're stating it here. Because it sounds like it fits in more with my paradigm, which is simply that something else is more important. That it's apples and oranges, not not apples. Im trying to say we shouldnt assume something on ts part, and thats what sd was saying? Thanks folks.
|
No, that is not what I am saying. I believe if the therapist does not remember something - it means it was simply not important enough to the therapist to remember it. I put the onus on the therapist for failure to remember - I do not doubt myself in what I said.