Hmm, I just find this whole thing interesting. Everyone comes to this from the angle of their own beliefs. Whether that be that God is perfect and infallible and omnipotent etc or whether that be following the rules of rational logic. Odd thing is, all of these thoughts are our thoughts from our perspective, not God's. Who is to say that the rules of rational logic are perfect or even accurate for example. That was something thought up by a fallible human. As well as many of the opinions of God and God's nature. i.e. in one argument it was stated that if God allows evil to exist, which causes suffering then he can't be all loving. Or he doesn't know about it so he's not all knowing etc. But honestly, who is to say that if evil things happen that means God is not all loving. Many a child would say their parents are not all loving because they ground them for a week. Maybe evil, or suffering are a necessary component to our existence and a loving God allows them to happen for our ultimate benefit. I guess what I'm saying is that the rules of rational logic are not infallible and perfect. Therefore they are not necessarily a good foundation for a discussion of this type. They can be if everyone agrees that they are the measure we want to apply to the problem, but if that doesn't happen then it only results in debate and hard feelings because each side thinks the other is arrogant and or not following the rules. A no win.