Not true - the comment is:

The guy who wrote this gem of a testimonial was not dumb - he was just being sloppy. He rushed and did not think of how to phrase his thought correctly. But he was not being dumb. Being sloppy is not a crime. It is simply human.

But the editors who posted it...

...right.

So if they cannot catch a flagrant issue such as this, how would I trust them in interpreting research findings, especially in a field that suffers from a can of worms in terms of methodological challenges? How would I trust them?

Lycanthrope - you keep talking about the guys who study our brains. So - medical researchers, right? Well, then let us read their peer reviewed publications. You keep referring to them, but we still have not read their work. Not somebody's interpretation of their work, but the work itself. PubMed provides abstracts for most articles, and, free pdf's for many though by far not all articles.