Quote:
Originally Posted by hamster-bamster
So, my question is, how can close-ups of mechanical penetration ever compare with that? Why are they necessary? If instead of showing his whole clothed body, and, via the whole body (and, obviously, all the intricate lighting work that must have been planned and executed with sheer professionalism), depicting the paroxysm of the orgasm, they'd show Marlon Brando's PENIS, I very much doubt that it'd be interesting.
|
I understand exactly what you mean. As a film buff and a big fan of lighting, I would find creative scenes like this very interesting to watch. But when guys want to look at porn, they are not always intersted in the lighting or creativity of the scene. They want something that gets to the point. They would see the coat as annoying because it obscures the act. Penetration does get repetative, but at the end of the day, that is what turns guys on.