Quote:
Originally Posted by tesseract49
I understand exactly what you mean. As a film buff and a big fan of lighting, I would find creative scenes like this very interesting to watch. But when guys want to look at porn, they are not always intersted in the lighting or creativity of the scene. They want something that gets to the point. They would see the coat as annoying because it obscures the act. Penetration does get repetative, but at the end of the day, that is what turns guys on.
|
I think I was unclear when I described the lighting. I did not admire the lighting - I was moved by the force of the scene. Sheer, raw force. Then I analyzed what (I think since I am not a student of film so I do not know) probably made the scene so forceful, and lighting came to mind because it seemed to play such a big role. But that was after the fact - when I watched it, I was moved and not calmly observing the lighting effects. It was very forceful, direct, candid - a great scene. Since you like these kind of things, you should definitely watch it. I should too - I stopped after that scene.
But the point it - for me this scene was greatly moving and NOT BORING, and in-and-out close-ups are not moving and boring. So, apparently, for men they are not boring - they are repetitive, but not boring. Right? Because for me - I would rather watch table tennis - same thing, more or less (movements back and forth and back and forth), but at least it is sometimes
unpredictable and the reactions of the players are fun to watch.