Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddler
Well, I don't know about other people. Maybe if you claim to live by morals. But I certainly won't claim so. I don't make excuses and I don't try to determine good or bad on anybodys doings. I don't think that that is the way life works. No following your morals is ever worth not following your instinct. Say you really like a married man whom you want to get to know. Well it may be wrong, but it would be a greater regret to miss that opportunity for an experience in your life, than not following you moral values. Unless your only goal in life is following your own moral and values that you made a long time ago. things change and the world moves on, you can't stay still alone or you will only fall behind.
|
Well, I wouldn't quite go with the notion of seeking out a man that is married, just because I like him. Not sure, if it's because of morals, or just plain integrity to not get involved with a mans inability to make a decision. I've talked about not wanting to play second fiddle, a couple times here, many times elsewhere.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocdwifeofsociopath
See and I completely disagree. I think the fact that they are both happy together places their relationship above your opportunity that will not be the last anyway. ieems most people talk the talk with morals and selflisness but certainly don't walk the walk. I put people into high consideration, albeit I do come first ultimately. It hurts that others don't.
|
That is to 'assume' that they are both 'happy' together, however.
I agree, many do talk the talk, but don't walk the walk. I do ask, why does it 'hurt' that they don't walk the walk? In an overall sense of society, as a whole, why does this seem to upset you so?