I know this is entirely subjective, but Jacob Levy was Jack the Ripper. I will always say that he is the Ripper.
Some detective has claimed that Jack may never have existed because of some weird reasons that don't really fit.
Again, subjective.
See, this case is so hard to talk about because everybody has different views. I've been interested in it for a few years now and even played a game based on it (Sherlock Holmes vs. Jack the Ripper). So, my opinion stems from a different point than someone else's might. Considering there are three main suspects who fit the bill, it's hard to choose only one.
I just needed to get this off of my chest, haha. I just have a firm belief he exists and him having more than the Canonical Five victims wouldn't bother me (that was one of the dude's reasons, if I'm not mistaken). I mean, since when have we characterized a serial killer by how many confirmed kills and unconfirmed kills he has done? Just because it is practically set in stone that Jack killed these five, no more, NO LESS, doesn't mean that he didn't kill more. Ted Bundy is a good example. That man has most likely killed way more than confirmed, but we're not saying that NO WAY did Ted Bundy not kill more than THIS MANY.
Sigh. I need to quit using the internet. It raises my blood pressure.
Time to go play the new Amnesia game!