the thread in question to which i am responsible to replying to did show rhaps side and mine, i showed my feelings on this, and i backed them up with facts, i posted a link from the same newspaper that rhap posted that showed that the law was not broken, but what i couldnt post was the link for the bio of the film in question before the post was locked, i will post it now,

http://festival.sundance.org/filmgui...aspx?film=4694

the original post could have been used in a more constructive way, instead it was used for something else, i will not be vilified for making my objection clear, i searched the sundance website for the films in question and based my opinions on that, how many other posters did the same?

this film presented in the proper manner could have been a great tool for dealing with our own sexual abuse problems, instead it was jump on the ban it ban it now bandwagon that certain people dont want others to be able to understand or talk openly about.