i dont see you proving anything wrong that i said in my last post in the first paragraph rhap concerning the validity of the original thread, why is that? is it because you are wrong? or even your take on the link i posted with the bio of the film explaining the film and its objective. if you had read the bio before you posted the original link you might have thought twice about posting it, or posted it in a differant context, every time we have differed in our opinions you cry foul and say i am attacking you, when in fact i am proving my point with proof that can be substansiated (sp) and not ill informed bigoted veiws.