Thank you. Maybe I should be more precised, we didn't really fight but I wouldn't call it a discussion neither... It was pretty clear that we both were angry at each other, we had different opinions and we both were sure that we're right But of course we both were not neither rude nor aggresive...

1914sierra: thank you for your comment, yes I think I will bring it up for the next session - I mean this that I felt very safe/calm when he was angry at me. However, from my not very objective point of view, rather he argued with me than me with him... I came to the session empty and disappointed and I told him that I am not sure if I can trust him anymore and that on one hand I want him badly to convince me that I can trust him but on the other hand I knew that he wouldn't do that because if I leave, he'll find another client who'll pay him so why should he put the effort in convincing me to trust him? But he didn't comment on it so I started giving him examples why I do not trust him and why I don't feel his empathy... And then he started disagreeing (btw I always hate when he overtalks me - for first seconds we both talk at the same time but I always give up) and raising his voice and telling me to think and that he was very emotional and angry at that time (and he really was). So probably I did provoke him to argue with me but I didn't do that in purpose - just the effect was so amazing that maybe I should annoy him more often?