Quote:
Originally Posted by feralkittymom
I can't speak to the law where you live. But were you specifically speaking about law with your T? It reads as a statement invalidating the sexual abuse of a child, casting blame, and completely non cognizant of the emotional effect of the words. I'm having difficulty imagining a conversation in which these statements would be acceptable.
|
Hmmm... No it was not in the context of law... It was in the context of memories (TRIGGER)
As I have hundreds of horrific memories I alwas thought that I remember everything but after one session I got much worse flashbacks and memories came back. Thus, at the session I said sth like I have always thought that I've never been raped (I meant no full sex) but I realized that it was not true and described few "new" memories and then my T agreed that I've never been raped but not with respect of type of sexual abuse but this what I've mentioned in previous post... So it was not with respect to law directly but it could be with respect to the correct definition, right?