Quote:
Originally Posted by Sometimes psychotic
Yeah I refuse to see this so negatively I refused for a long time to read books that began with the words sz is a devastating illness or articles that have some picture of a face that's been fracture or warped...like it's not disturbing enough...it's clear that those articles are for shock value for neurotypicals...it's like they think that no one with sz wants to read them. I mean we don't put people up with amputations for cancer articles right...that would just be cruel but it seems ok to make fun of sz.
|
Yup. I was just reading an article on Jani Schofield (I plan on starting a thread about her if there isn't already one), allegedly one of the youngest and most severe cases of early-onset schizophrenia ever (and the most highly publicized if you ask me), and her parents talk about her diagnosis like it's a death sentence; the article called it "one of the worst mental illnesses known to man". Er, last I checked, personality disorders have worse prognoses and anorexia has the highest fatality rate, so what defines it as the "worst"? The stigma? In my opinion, I would choose sz or sza over plenty of other diagnoses (like severe OCD, panic attacks, catatonic depression, conversion disorder, even eating disorders, etc.) but I guess I'm biased because I've lived with this for so long that I can't imagine the person I'd be without it. During treatment, through talking to relatives, and online, I have met plenty of functional people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar with psychotic features-- they may not be "cured", but that doesn't mean they can't make a life for themselves.