Quote:
Originally Posted by blackwhitered
Okay, this is from Wikipedia, so it may not be valid, but it's still relevant:
"In 1970 psychiatrists Robins and Guze introduced new criteria for deciding on the validity of a diagnostic category and proposed that cases of schizophrenia where people recovered well were not really schizophrenia but a separate condition."
|
Yes, if you define sz as something one never recovers from, then anyone who has recovered didn't have it - by definition. But then you'd only know if someone has sz in retrospect as there's no way to know if the person in front you at the moment has it or not because you don't have a crystal ball to see if they'll recover. So, it's stupid to tell someone they have a condition from which they'll never recover. You'd just have to wait until they do or don't recover. It's useless, and no predictions can be made based on it. I can guarantee you, though, that if you go around telling people they'll never recover, and you have the kind of authority that makes them believe you, there's a much better chance they'll never recover. It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.