View Single Post
 
Old Feb 18, 2014, 04:50 PM
Anonymous817219
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well, nimh got some praise a few years ago for controlling corporate involvement in two or three studies but they have gotten a lot of harsh criticism too. This is not actually a study and does not include anybody without a relationship to ely lily.

I do believe in the bio social idea. The Neuro plasticity changes also relate to nature related issues. There is a phd that study's this in autistic children. That's actually what got me interested. Iow, mindful practice (for example) is effective for the inherited side of the puzzle. I also believe ads are helpful when appropriate. However, I do not buy into the idea of a life long requirement so long as you follow more then med treatment. In fact I find the idea of a lifetime on meds to be extremely detrimental for many reasons. In the 60's and earlier people would not, in most cases, experience relapses or progressive illness characteristics after treatment. It climbed dramatically in the 90's on. There are many theories but meds seem the most obvious.

Side note is there are people working on the possibility of epigenome changes within your lifetime. Mindfulness may also effect this. Before it was thought changes in the epigenome layer effected future generations. Big pharma is also working on meds for this but I will be watching what other find out without meds