Quote:
Originally Posted by ocdwifeofsociopath
I do want to point out that when i was first diagnosed i asked multiple doctors, neurologists, and psychologists what happens to the brain that makes the illness After the cause. ie: Genetics, trauma, etc. This is the start of where I got my information. I'm not pulling this out of thin air.
|
Never thought you were pulling out of thin air. Not impressed with doctors that come out of school and rely on sales people for new information which is more common than you think. Have met two teaching - a t and a psychologist that didn't seem to read anything new any more. Point isn't that they weren't good professionals. It's that I like to know their background before I completely trust the info they give me. My t and my pa regularly study new information which why I like them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocdwifeofsociopath
how about this, not developing as expected. Does that satisfy you? The fact I was talking about with my finger is the Affect. Because my finger was broken in a door, it is now crooked. Granted that technically is not a fact, but probable. I say fact lightly. I shouldn't. In my experience, most people don't separate fact from probable theory. I had no intentions of this getting down to the significance of a slight misuse of a word. Which is all it's become. The bottom line, is that my first post is true to the best of our knowledge at this point, with the allowances of light use of some words (to get the general point across), and with it, there was no offense.
|
As long as it is presented as a theory
That your finger is bent from the door is fact. It is repeatable. I could go smash my finger and have it be bent too.
Again. Didn't take it as an intended offense. But the claim of an abnormally developing brain for most MI is offensive to me whether you intended it or not.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk