View Single Post
 
Old Mar 10, 2014, 01:00 AM
hamster-bamster hamster-bamster is offline
Account Suspended
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 14,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by growlithing View Post
If someone were to touch me in the right places, I'd have an orgasm regardless of if I'm in love with that person or even attracted to that person or even being touched consensually.
How one can get an orgasm while being touched NOT consensually is completely beyond my understanding. There is this great scholastic tool called an input-output machine. It can be used to explain the concept of functions to young children, without ever using the word "function". Say, instead of writing f(x)=2x+1 we would say:

"If you put X into the I/O machine, what would happen first is that X would be doubled and what would happen next is that 1will be added to the result.

Let us try putting numbers into the I/O machine and see what the machine spits out. If the input is 2, the output is 5. If the input is 10, the output 21."

The input/output machine is completely predictable. If we wait for a week and place 2 into the machine described above, it would spit out 5. If we repeat it in a month, same result.

What you are trying to describe - having special places on the body that, if "activated", spit out the expected output, no matter what - be the touch consensual/non-consensual, or be attraction/attachment/feeling present or not, - seems to be similar to an I/O machine. I can definitely see positive aspects to having the body respond to stimuli in known, predictable ways, but, again, it does not describe me.

Some time ago I learned that Kim Basinger advocated for teaching women who find themselves in a situation that places them at high risk of rape to give blowjobs because it is much safer. I would not try to find a link because putting those terms into a search engine would produce porn. Anyway, years before I learned of such an approach by Kim Basinger, I figured it out on my own when I got myself into a dangerous situation and realized that I had to take the least risk, and I quickly did it (while in a moving vehicle). The recipient was at his most peaceful after that and stopped the vehicle to express his appreciation, and I used the opportunity to get out of the vehicle and rush to the subway station. I felt a little shaken and a little dirty, but not too much, and by the time bf3/h1 fetched me from the subway station, I could converse as if nothing had happened.

So did I orgasm from giving the guy a blow job? No. But with H2, not always but often, I would experience an "emphathetic orgasm" while and after fellating him (he also had very vocal orgasms, so it was probably easier for me to go along with his cue, plus due to frequent sex over a long span of time I knew his body responses - every twitch - very well, which probably enabled me to almost feel his orgasm).

I would never say that I gave the husband blowjobs - I fellated him. I would say that I gave a blowjob to get out of what could have been a really bad rape case. I would not say, ever, that I fellated that guy who could have raped me. The linguistic distinctions help underscore that although the mechanical movements might have been the same, their meaning and feeling (or lack thereof) behind them wasn't. If the I/O machine scenario applied to me, I would have felt empathy when giving a blowjob to get out of a worse rape, but this idea makes me laugh.

Again, I definitely see value in having spots on the body that give a predictable, reliable response no matter the circumstances.