I've read this article before - and I realize the messenger/message thing too - but even here these "edicts" as I would call them seem a bit politically correct and harsh - and seemingly brazen means of blowing up people's thinking and some of this to me just seems like it is just a normal, acceptable part of anybody's life and human living. The way it's presented as such seems like it is just pushy and very black and white. But then again, that's the way I've seen Ellis present it and some of the others in the Institute write about them. It could certainly be done with a lot more emotions and a lot less demand of its own, I think.