I talked to my t about this. He thought psychology today was doing it to sell magazines. I think it was purposely written to confuse. Sorry, i was upset by it yesterday and shouldnt have taken it out on you. Like did you ever see an article that had lists of do's and don't's, and it's very confusing to read because they have one dont at the top of a list, then they list a bunch of bad things - and if you start reading in the middle of the list, youre like wtf? Thats kind of what they did here. I think the writer took a bunch of bad articles as his source and threw them together for this article, without really rewriting them. It comes across as a guide to the wrong way. Truly an immoral way, you are right. Im disappointed in psychology today.