The only place I've ever seen attachment styles mentioned is here on PC and in articles linked from here. T has never mentioned it; we have discused transference, and affect theory, and other psychology/psychotherapy concepts so it's not that he avoids the specialised concepts (and I am grateful that he doesn't avoid them), but attachment styles have never been mentioned. I don't really believe in the model presented anyway, for two reasons: first, it seems much too simplified, and second, as I have said before I don't think that any one attachment style is inherently better, but the terms they have chosen for the styles imply that only one attachment style is acceptable.

I am attached to my T but that has nothing to do with attachment styles, as far as I am concerned.