Sorry to harp on this myself but I finally found the article I was looking for:
TOO CLOSE FOR COMFORT - The Neurology of Love and Loss in Borderline Personalities
In it she admits she was wrong in her approach to BPD although in some nicely avoidant words:
Quote:
|
My personal bias has always been to view BPD primarily from a core trauma perspective, and that's how I'd (unwittingly) worked with borderline personality clients long before I knew about this disorder. In hindsight, my efforts were successful in bringing about healing and growth--but the work spanned many years, and there were frequent setbacks and regressions.
|
Right there she essentially says most of her other articles with their basis in core trauma are not entirely correct.
Is also interesting to note she is somewhat behind most other professionals in accepting this view.