The examples do not seem humorous to me. But I'm not inclined to laugh at that which I do not understand. I'm more inclined to try to learn more.

The examples seem like the therapist is focused on physiological reactions to attachment injuries or trauma.

I'm glad that there are therapists out there who are intelligent enough to go deep on issues in a real way, observing and drawing out the emotions that need healing.

In my view, once you get to talking about emotions and memories that trigger a response in the body, you are going to a deep and powerful place within. I would only go that deep with someone I really trusted or knew for a long time.

For what it's worth, because I can imagine others' reactions, my day job involves numbers, physics and computational science. So, I like it when therapists involve the aspects of neuroscience that appear to be relevant to therapy.