Moronic drivel to me. I'd rather consider the other pathologies and disregard overgeneralizing ''all encompassing'' diagnoses. There are so many things that this DSM V crap lets slide that I can't even count on every single limb I have, including my two balls.

Edit: alas, I'd said already I wouldn't enter the merits of such a pointless debate. That's not even my opinion it's FACT, so it's a moot point that I should argue with this. If you guys feel comfortable with the DSM, feel free to live on with it and the quacks that develop it.

BTW, that's the 1992 edition of the DSM, I've got the 2008 book here. Things have changed...do youm homework right fellas. Eductae yerselves with something with a cover and pages inside for a change.