so they 'rethought' (or actually thought) about the data... and realised that anti-d's were more likely to be harmful than helpful to children...

and then they 'rethought' (or actually thought) about the data... and realised that anti-d's were more likely to be harmful than helpful to adolescents...

anybody see where they might be going with this?

sheesh. i don't feel quite so bad supporting british american tobacco after all ;-)