Isn't it interesting how statisticians can often make the data say pretty much anything they want it to?

I am sooo out of the loop since I stopped studying ... I am sure psisci can correct me.

But I thought with the use of ADs in adolescents there has for quite some time been guidelines in place that the clinical need should be balanced with the risk of increase of suicidal ideation etc.

E.g., it's prescribed quite carefully and often to a group of patients who are at elevated risk anyway?

Much the same principal as if you're prescribing ADs for a pregnant woman and the risks and benefits there?

Just curious ... please feel free to correct me :>