Quote:
Originally Posted by Lauliza
It must no give the whole paper, which is too long anyway at over 100 pages. I was citing a citation within this paper, not their actual findings of this paper. We all know that correlation does not equal causation, but such findings will raise awareness of the link. Whether it has any real relationship is yet to be seen. But but it certainly makes an awful lot of sense as it would in any situation where people are exploited or victimized. This paper is interesting for the fact alone it that psychologists who had been sanctioned for violations and lost their licenses actually agreed to participate.
|
The dissertation is there, I just have no interest in reading it all. I've read a lot of Gabbard's and Pope's works who also have treated offending Ts. What becomes clear is that the psychological basis for why and how some Ts offend is far more complex than any logistical conditions of their practices. What still puzzles me is the "link" you refer to. It is exactly that "link" that I find to be misleading. And that's because I think it supports a false sense of security that draws attention away from a number of other issues clients should be more aware of as consumers. There is a progression of behaviors ( behaviors being the manifestations of causative conditions) that has been cited in the research that constitutes red flags for abuse, and they happen regardless of whether a T practices alone or in a group setting.