Quote:
Originally Posted by Materly
The philosophy , I don't understand. I do though , understand the basic premise of scientific endeavour. We pose scientific questions , the scientific research seeks to answer these questions or we make a statement of proposed fact , and we undertake scientific research to confirm or reject that same statement. If we cannot confirm or reject , we make another statement that is informed by the previous research , and on and on goes the process. Its a very mechanical process , the 'question' or 'statement' is specific , or in good science , it should be ; 'let's see what happens' is poor science.
|
i think philosophy of science should be more widely taught.
It's inevitable that 'we' shift into an acknowledgement by the orthodox/mainstream of the paranormal/non-physical at some stage - & the breakthrough could come from a number of areas. There simply is the evidence for it all, which is currently denied.
No point in debating it, & it's tiresome to.