Iīd say this is a very important aspect thatīs often overlooked. The meeting between a client and a T is about
health care and because of that the client is in more vulnerable state than the T. Or should be at least. Thatīs why you canīt expect clients to always act rationally or to adjust behaviour to a T.
But what Iīve noticed when seeing so many T:s as I have, I feel many T:s sits their talking like it was an ordinary "coffee chat". As an example Iīve told T:s I sometimes have suicide thoughts, I have no plans and I donīt harm myself but still. They made a short comment and then they moved on.
Instead of paying more notice to such severe comments from a client, theyīve looked more to being able to ask a lot of questions. Thatīs another harmful thing for what if this was my number one issue? Of course I myself can stop them and tell them I want to talk more about a certain issue but when they show so little understanding and interest I donīt feel they are suitable as my T.
T:s can do much harm already during evalution, I had one T almost falling asleep and even if I know that hadnīt to do with me personally, I felt let down and sad and I never returned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LindaLu
Hey Meow, I agree with some of what you're saying about client responsibility, being an effective consumer of mental health services, and retaining the "right" therapist. But we are talking about consumers with mental health problems. Some of us have had horrific life experiences. The therapeutic relationship makes us perfectly vulnerable to Ts who have economic interests that diverge from our economic interests. The T might not be consciously conniving or scheming, but unknowingly strings out sessions and fosters dependency to keep their revenue stream. And Lauliza is right about the private practitioner. That person is especially motivated to hold onto clients. Not just for monetary reasons but because of comfort and familiarity.
|