View Single Post
 
Old Nov 28, 2015, 05:20 PM
mle1115 mle1115 is offline
Member
 
Member Since: Nov 2015
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Open Eyes View Post
I saw this article and could not help but think of you mle1115, notice it actually says in the article "four months" as you have said your relationship lasted.

These individuals never get to know YOU. They have their typical wine and dine charisma, but they don't have the "depth and empathy" that keeps a relationship going long term.

When I said to you, you are only grieving "the dream of", that really is what this individual could never provide you with. It's important to recognize this when spending time dating a new individual that may have might just sweep you off your feet, but may not have any more depth then that first burst of excitement. Many women think it must be their fault, a mistake because the reality is these individuals really never saw "you", but instead were simply looking for yet another individual to praise "them".
This is really interesting. I actually didn't see where it said "four months" but the 3 week time frame really stuck out to me. What was the four months in reference to? Three weeks is when I first started realizing something was off, and when I first started questioning him about it. He didn't like that at all. The deeper I dug over time, the more horrified I became. I actually ended up severely ill by the end of our relationship, and my therapist thinks it was largely a result of the anxiety I was experiencing from the relationship.

I also found the "self sabotage" part really interesting. I told him literally those exact same words several times. I kept telling him he was self-sabotaging by purposely putting things in the way of our being closer. I could go on forever about that. Let's just say the final straw was him changing his custody agreement so that he had his kids all week every week instead of every other week. He initially claimed it was his ex-wife's idea. It came out later that he had come up with it so he could give them "more consistency at home with their homework." Another control tactic. He claimed this change "didn't affect me at all." We lived an hour away from each other and only saw each other when he didn't have his kids. I had just met them, and when I told him I would change my work schedule to come spend one night a week helping with the kids' homework and whatever else he needed, he told me it "wasn't what he had asked for." He had asked for me to stop arguing with him. Of course. How dare I question his decision making abilities? He also refused to cut back on work on extra work he had taken over the weekends to so we could spend more time together even though he claimed that work paid for our vacations and going out to dinner. I told him I didn't need that and would much rather us have more quality time together. It didn't matter. My asking him to do anything to accommodate me and my needs was out of the question.

It became very clear to me at that point that nothing I did was ever going to be good enough, even though I had offered him everything he "claimed" he wanted. I bailed about a week after that, even though I actually had already changed my work schedule to help with his kids. Even in the several conversations we had post-breakup, he still refused to believe he would ever self-sabotage our relationship while at the same time claiming that he was "terrible at relationships." So confusing. You never know who the real person is that you're talking to.

Anyway, thanks for this article and the thought! The timelines were particularly interesting to me, as they synced up so clearly to my own.

Last edited by mle1115; Nov 28, 2015 at 06:28 PM.