Today, I had an appointment with my psychiatrist, where she as much as said, definitely implied, that I was lazy, living off the state.

She also restated how I am still not normal—though not at all manic, which I consider a compliment.

We have subdued arguments that sometimes get stingy. No harm done, but I am a bit afraid it will escalate. Being on friendly terms is fine, but I also need a psychiatrist with some professional restraint. Going for obvious weaknesses is no fair play.

I run my own business, doing and supporting scientific research, but sometimes need some "timeout" on disability, which I of course greatly enjoy.

***** 'm.

Or do you think such a thing could be beneficial? Sticks and stones, what doesn't kill you, ERP, and such.

I tend to think it's a good thing. If I want someone who doesn't challenge me, I can just as well talk to myself.

Any of you have any similar stories? Would you go for a gloves-off or soft-touch clinician (I have both, but not very soft-touch, luckily)?