Just to be clear: my theories have abstracted away intelligence long ago as inessential and too complex, but it does mean something. Mostly just appearances, form. "Narcissism" helps. Borderline SZ helps immensely. It might not be correct, but it appears abstract, so it must be correct and highly intelligent. Up to a point of course.

But it's really not thinking highly of myself. I do, but not because of intelligence. I see myself as having a rational mind, but that's not nearly as developed as other things. Hence the IQ.

Edit:
So I like to equate intelligence to something more important, like "psychoticism", but of the disorganised, developmental BP, SZ, SZA/BP type. But it's more like some "rationality", confidence and similarity to other people, rationally.

BP-II towards the BP-I is therefore probably nearest to intelligence as well as ASD, the Asperger's part towards the normalcy side or a bit beyond that. But it highly depends on perception. It's really not an objective measure, unless it takes perceptual, individual, societal differences into account.

People with a dark complexion are less intelligent than those with a very light complexion. That's how useless the concept is.

Humanities anxiety is another thing. Those more towards mathematics and the natural sciences and between the sciences and the humanities a bit towards the humanities end but still scientific, are most intelligent. That's useless.

Mathematics is very irrational, in some way.