thats true, it IS a legal concept, i had forgotten about that. mcnaughten defence 'n all :-)

but... its not measuring that - is it?

i mean... even psychiatrists don't measure insanity 'that is for jurys to decide' the DSM says...

while psychiatrists give specialist testimony about likely mental state insanity is only for juries to decide...

i guess... i'm a little sceptical about the 'for fun' tests. in this instance i'm concerned that people will think that it is more than 'for fun'. that it is a tool that really does measure insanity...

how could the test show you something you weren't aware of when the test measures self report?????

and...

if you are aware that it is a problem enough to report it in the test then how does the test tell you anything you didn't already know?????