I guess, for me, I think questioning is always good. I don't want to roll over and submit to those guys (I get that others don't see it as that and for those others - then I guess it would not be)
Perhaps I don't find things about specific therapists or their job in general to bother me because I don't consider that I have a relationship, other than in the most perfunctory of ways, with either of them, nor do I think that what others do with their therapists have any bearing on what I use the ones I see for. How is it different than reading conflicting studies or papers or ted talks? I guess I don't see how a forum of strangers could help but cause some questioning unless it was made up of drones. And if questioning does occur, is it really the fault of a forum where one knows others are anonymous, have varying ideas, varying types of therapy, and greatly different reasons for seeing a therapist and for being on such a forum?
Or one could take the approach of therapists and just consider all a part of the ephemeral and opaque process.