I was one of the two most injured plaintiffs in that case, do not be fooled by that number, the lawyers were on the take and so was the judge, when the judge was assigned the case his first public statement was " I don't care who was injured how , no one is going to drive a pharmaceutical company this large bankrupt or out of business"

The final settlement played the weak against the strong, injuries were ranked on a scale from 0-9, 9 being death 0 being a small reaction to the drug.

Lilly agreed to settle only if 80 % or more plaintiffs agreed to the settlement, so all the people who did not have a severe injury or injuries agreed to settle for the entire group, those of us with a real case didn't have a chance, if the weak cases had not of settled Lilly was going to fight every last case and the corrupt lawyers told plaintiffs take the payout it's guaranteed free money, you will probably end with nothing if you fight. So all the weaker cases of mild injury sealed the fate of those of us who would have taken them down, there were boards like this at the time of just us plaintiffs, I don't know of a single person who took precautions as I suggested them other than myself.

The lawyers were quick with the paperwork overnight presided by them and we would have to sign and return overnight, they were so quick that they failed to notice that on every page there was a non disclosure agreement and a release of liability and harm for all the lawyers the company and judge, I am the last of the plaintiffs with an active claim because I color scared the originals and have them put away the forms returned to them were modified with the word "not" added everywhere it said " I do hold harmless the company, the attorneys etc" insert "not" after "do" changes the entire meaning of every document, nobody noticed that was done , I will get my pound of flesh someday, they never apologized or took responsibility for the whole cover up, the people who really got a little justice where the eight whistle blowers from Lilly who supplied the internal documents showing that from day one of playing with the chemical that became the drug, Lilly new it caused diabetes, heart attacks and death- they all got golden parachutes out of the company and 8 million dollars cash each as a starting point, we'll those of us who bled and died got nothing , just so they could be the first atypical anti psychotic approved by the FDA, Lilly intentionally failed to report the actual side effects of the drug because they new the FDA would not allow it on the market otherwise, now of course everyone knows to expect "Metabolic syndrome" from all of the atypicals .

It is known now that all the promises made about better drugs, less side effects and all that crap was just that crap, they suck just as the original Major Tranquilizers now called Neuroleptics ( the breakdown of that word neuro = nerve, leptic= seizing think about what these drugs are supposedly doing in the brain, is nerve seizing anything near "helping" a neurotransmitter balance/ imbalance, I don't think so)

I do not take any drug that has not had its patent expire with no severe life changing side effects, I will let others be the Guinea pigs, I am done, sorry for the length but you all needed the truth about the lawsuit, if anyone has and questions ask away I'll be glad to answer anything I can, look my introduction up if you want a little back round on me , public service was my life before " I lost on Jeopardy, the category was genetics , I thought Alex Teebek said Dianetics and answered L.Ron Hubbard" yes I am sarcastic and have a dark sense of humor ( but I have managed to keep that, that's a +1).

Misterpain

Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk