Ah, Alexandra, you imply that DocJohn hasn't a mind of his own and can't independently look at the complaints and what the posts say and judge whether they're a genuine problem or not and/or doesn't have a clue what is going on on his own board? There's 100s of "active" members and having 6-8 complain isn't necessarily going to get something censured? But I imagine any wrangling at all, whether "legit" or not is going to get a thread looked at and logically it just happens that if it is a thread/chat discussion one is "for," the "disturbance" might get it closed. So, yes, being "ganged up on" doesn't look fair in that light but one can't know what happens to the others, the ganger-uppers? I doubt that can happen too often without some censure of their actions (as opposed to a particular post/topic, a "thing" more easily let go of than one's personal way of being/actions being criticized) as such a pattern would be a disturbance of the larger group in itself? It doesn't always go "their" way, even when it looks like it does to us down here in the peanut gallery.